Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (11) TMI 169 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Mere non-deposit of sale consideration in designated account doesn't disqualify Section 54F capital gains exemption claim The Karnataka HC held that mere non-deposit of sale consideration in a designated capital gains account does not disqualify an assessee from claiming ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Mere non-deposit of sale consideration in designated account doesn't disqualify Section 54F capital gains exemption claim

                          The Karnataka HC held that mere non-deposit of sale consideration in a designated capital gains account does not disqualify an assessee from claiming exemption under Section 54F for long-term capital gains. Following the precedent in K. Ramachandra Rao case, the court ruled that the reassessment order and notices were contrary to law and quashed them, deciding in favor of the assessee.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Validity of the reassessment order under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Legitimacy of the demand notice under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act.
                          3. Appropriateness of the penalty notice under Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Income Tax Act.
                          4. Compliance with Section 54F of the Income Tax Act regarding exemption from capital gains tax.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of the Reassessment Order:

                          The petitioner challenged the reassessment order dated 28.03.2022, issued under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, on the grounds that it was contrary to the facts and law. The petitioner had sold an industrial land and invested part of the proceeds in purchasing a residential site and constructing a house within the prescribed periods, thereby claiming exemption from long-term capital gains tax. The initial assessment order accepted the petitioner's returns, but a subsequent notice under Section 148 indicated potential escaped income, leading to the reassessment. The court found that the reassessment order was contrary to the law as established in previous judgments, where non-deposit in a capital gains account did not preclude exemption if the sale proceeds were invested in construction within the stipulated time.

                          2. Legitimacy of the Demand Notice:

                          The demand notice under Section 156, issued alongside the reassessment order, was also contested. The petitioner argued that the demand was unjustified as the investment in the residential site and construction was completed within the statutory period, thus qualifying for capital gains tax exemption under Section 54F. The court, referencing prior case law, concluded that the demand notice was unwarranted since the petitioner complied with the investment requirements for exemption, and the non-deposit in a capital gains account was not a disqualifying factor.

                          3. Appropriateness of the Penalty Notice:

                          The penalty notice under Section 274 read with Section 270A was issued for alleged non-compliance with capital gains tax obligations. The petitioner contended that the penalty was inappropriate given the compliance with Section 54F conditions. The court, aligning with its findings on the reassessment and demand notices, determined that the penalty notice was unjustified. The petitioner's actions were consistent with the legal provisions for claiming exemption, and the penalty was therefore quashed.

                          4. Compliance with Section 54F:

                          Central to the case was whether the petitioner fulfilled the conditions of Section 54F for exemption from capital gains tax. The petitioner had invested the sale proceeds in constructing a residential house within three years, as required. The respondents argued that failure to deposit the remaining sale proceeds in a designated capital gains account precluded exemption. However, the court, referencing precedent, held that actual investment in construction within the prescribed period sufficed for exemption, irrespective of deposit in a capital gains account. The court reiterated that the legislative intent of Section 54F was to facilitate investment in residential property, not to mandate deposit in a specific account.

                          Conclusion:

                          The court allowed the petition, quashing the reassessment order, demand notice, and penalty notice. It emphasized that the petitioner's compliance with Section 54F, through timely investment in residential construction, entitled them to exemption from capital gains tax, rendering the impugned notices and orders legally untenable.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found