Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under section 54F could be denied merely because the residential house was registered beyond the stipulated period, when the assessee had paid the full consideration and taken possession within time.
Analysis: The sale of the original capital asset was accepted. The decisive facts were that the assessee had paid the entire consideration for the new residential property within the prescribed period and had also taken possession of the property within that time. The property was later registered, but the delay in registration was treated as not controlling for the purpose of section 54F. The reasoning followed the principle that where the investment in the new house is completed by payment and possession within the statutory period, exemption cannot be refused solely because the registered conveyance was executed later.
Conclusion: Exemption under section 54F was allowable to the assessee, and the Revenue's objection on the basis of delayed registration failed.