Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported Weak Coking Coal satisfied the ash content condition under Notification No. 11/97-Cus. and whether the Revenue's laboratory reports could be relied upon to deny the exemption.
Analysis: The material on record showed that the Load Port certificate and the discharge-port SGS report both recorded ash content below 12% and were based on recognised testing methods. By contrast, the Revenue's sample remained in its custody for several months before testing, the sample description differed from the imported goods, the reports of the Customs House Laboratory and CFRI were inconsistent with each other, and CFRI itself noted that the sample was not representative as per IS standards. The evidence also showed no satisfactory proof that sampling and testing were carried out in accordance with the prescribed standards. In these circumstances, the adverse reports lacked reliability and could not outweigh the consistent favourable reports produced by the appellant.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 11/97-Cus., and the denial of exemption based on the Revenue's reports was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and both appeals succeeded with consequential relief.