Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could be sustained when the petitioner asserted that the notices and order were not effectively communicated, resulting in denial of opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.
Analysis: The impugned assessment was founded on the petitioner's non-response to the show cause notice. The petitioner maintained that the proceedings were not known to it because the notices and order were uploaded only on the GST portal. In view of the stated lack of effective participation, the matter warranted reconsideration so that the petitioner could file a reply and contest the tax proposals, subject to payment of a part of the disputed demand as a condition for restoration.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after giving the petitioner an opportunity to reply and a personal hearing, on condition of payment of 10% of the disputed tax demand.