Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under the Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955, a receiver of an estate could be assessed as a separate unit on the entire agricultural income, or whether the assessment had to follow the status of the persons entitled to the income.
Analysis: Section 3 charges tax on the total agricultural income of every person, and "person" includes an individual or association of individuals owning or holding property, including through an agent or receiver. Section 8(1) expressly provides that tax leviable on a receiver is recoverable from the receiver in the same manner and to the same extent as it would be from the person on whose behalf the income is received, showing that the receiver has no independent status for assessment purposes. The assessment must therefore reflect the status of the person or persons entitled to the property and income, while the receiver is assessed only as the representative through whom the income is received.
Conclusion: The receiver could not be treated as an independent unit of assessment for the entire income; the assessment had to accord with the status of the beneficiaries. The revision orders were set aside and the petitions succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A receiver is assessable only in a representative capacity and, for income-tax purposes, his assessment must follow the status of the persons on whose behalf the income is received.