TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>GST Registration Restored: Taxpayer Given Four-Week Window to Clear Overdue Returns and Settle Outstanding Dues</h1> <h3>Biswajit Basu Versus The Superintendent of Central Goods and Services Tax & Central Excise, Range-I, Joka Division & Ors.</h3> Biswajit Basu Versus The Superintendent of Central Goods and Services Tax & Central Excise, Range-I, Joka Division & Ors. - 2024 (91) G.S.T.L. 392 (Cal.) Issues:Challenge to cancellation of registration under WB GST/CGST ActAppeal rejection under Section 107 of the ActDetailed Analysis:The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of registration under the WB GST/CGST Act and the rejection of the appeal under Section 107 of the Act. The petitioner was served with a show cause notice for cancellation of registration due to non-filing of returns for a continuous period of six months. The petitioner stated that due to the pre-covid period, they could not appropriately respond, leading to the cancellation of registration. Although the petitioner did not apply for revocation, an appeal was made under Section 107 of the Act, which was rejected as time-barred by the Appellate Authority.The petitioner expressed readiness to comply with the provisions of the Act to continue their business. The respondent argued that the petitioner failed to comply with the Act, leading to the cancellation of registration. The Court noted that the cancellation was based on non-filing of returns and not on tax evasion or dubious practices. Recognizing that suspension/revocation would be counterproductive to revenue interests, the Court decided to permit the petitioner to carry on their business by setting aside the registration cancellation order.Referring to a previous case, the Court directed the petitioner to file returns for the entire default period and pay the necessary tax, interest, fine, and penalty. Compliance within four weeks would result in the restoration of the petitioner's registration. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the petition. The respondents were instructed to activate the portal promptly for compliance. Consequently, the order rejecting the appeal was also set aside, and the writ petition was disposed of without costs. All parties were directed to act based on the server copy of the order downloaded from the Court's official website.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
