Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rectification of mistake application disclosed any error apparent on the record in the final order so as to warrant recall or modification.
Analysis: The application sought to raise factual contentions that were not shown to have been urged before the Adjudicating Authority or considered in the appeal on which the final order was passed. The record showed that the appeal had been decided on merits and limitation, and that the impugned order had already examined the nature of the raw material, the statements recorded under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the classification of the yarn waste under Chapter 55 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal held that the plea regarding the purchase period did not establish any mistake apparent on the face of the record and that the application was, in substance, an attempt to reopen the concluded appeal.
Conclusion: No rectifiable error was made out and the application was not maintainable as a basis for reopening the final order.