Business Support Services tax not leviable on cinema box office sharing where theatre operator acted on a principal-to-principal basis.

Service tax on a cinema owner's share of net box office collections was not sustainable under Business Support Services because the theatre operator acted on a principal-to-principal basis, retained control over screening, and bore the business risks and statutory liabilities. The revenue-sharing formula was treated only as a method of quantifying consideration, not as evidence of an unincorporated joint venture with film distributors. On the agreements and the manner of operation, the arrangement did not involve the mutual sharing of profits and losses characteristic of a joint venture, and the Tribunal followed earlier decisions rejecting taxability on similar facts.

---

---

Issues: Whether the demand of service tax under the category of Business Support Services on the cinema owner's share of net box office collections was sustainable, and whether the arrangement with film distributors created an unincorporated joint venture.

Analysis: The arrangement was examined in the light of the agreements between the theatre owner and the film distributors, the manner in which films were screened, and the sharing of net box office collections. The Tribunal noted that the theatre owner acted on a principal-to-principal basis, retained control over screening, bore the business risks and statutory liabilities, and did not share profits and losses with the distributors in a manner characteristic of a joint venture. The revenue-sharing arrangement was treated as a method for quantifying consideration, not as proof of an unincorporated joint venture or provision of taxable support services. The issue had already been decided against taxability in earlier Tribunal decisions on the same kind of arrangement.

Conclusion: The demand under Business Support Services was not sustainable, no unincorporated joint venture was formed, and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

---