Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation or otherwise liable to be rejected on the basis of the date of default and the restructuring of the debt.
Analysis: The Corporate Debtor did not dispute the NPA classification, the restructuring of the liability, or the admission of liability recorded in the restructuring correspondence. Even if the date of default was taken as 30.04.2018, the subsequent restructuring in March 2021 contained an acknowledgment of liability before expiry of the three-year limitation period. The part-payments made later did not dilute that acknowledgment. The creditor was also entitled under the restructuring terms to revoke the sanction upon default and restore the original liability. The other objections, including alleged non-compliance with the circular and malicious filing, were found unsubstantiated.
Conclusion: The Section 7 application was within limitation and the admission of the petition was sustained. The appeal failed and the CIRP was allowed to continue.
Ratio Decidendi: An acknowledgment of liability made before expiry of limitation extends the limitation period for a Section 7 insolvency , and a creditor may rely on the contractual restructuring terms to revoke the restructuring upon default and proceed on the restored liability.