Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order disallowing input tax credit was liable to be set aside for being a non-speaking order passed without considering the taxpayer's reply, and whether the petitioner was entitled to a further opportunity before the authorities.
Analysis: The order rejecting the reply contained no reasons and merely recorded non-satisfaction with the explanation offered by the petitioner regarding an inadvertent clerical entry in the return. Such a summary rejection, without dealing with the objection raised, was held to be in breach of the principles of natural justice. The plea that the error could be rectified under Section 161 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was also noticed, and the matter was treated as one warranting reconsideration by the authority.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the petitioner was granted one final opportunity to appear before the respondent authorities with supporting materials; failure to avail that opportunity would result in revival of the impugned order.