Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a pre-existing dispute existed between the parties so as to bar admission of the Section 9 insolvency petition.
Analysis: The record showed documentary correspondence, police complaints, and communications concerning possession of the leased premises and the outstanding dues before issuance of the demand notice. The dispute between the parties was not an afterthought and was already alive when the insolvency process was invoked. Applying the settled test that the adjudicating authority must see whether there is a real and plausible dispute, the materials disclosed a genuine pre-existing dispute relating to both liability and possession issues. In such a situation, the petition under Section 9 was not maintainable.
Conclusion: The existence of a pre-existing dispute is established and the Section 9 petition was rightly rejected.