Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application under Section 94(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed by a personal guarantor was maintainable when there was no material showing invocation of the personal guarantee and the available notices were only for enforcement of the corporate debtor's security interest.
Analysis: The application was examined on the basis of the record, including the SARFAESI notices and the additional material produced by the applicant. The notices relied upon were issued for enforcement of security interest against the corporate debtor and did not show any separate notice invoking the applicant's personal guarantee. The record also did not show any step taken by the bank to proceed against the applicant in the capacity of personal guarantor or to recover dues from her personal assets. The filing of recovery proceedings against the principal borrower and other guarantors under Section 19 of the recovery legislation was held not to amount to invocation of the guarantee. On these facts, the application was found to have been filed without a sufficient cause and before the necessary foundation for initiation of proceedings against the personal guarantor had been laid.
Conclusion: The application under Section 94(1) was not maintainable at that stage and was dismissed as premature.