Appeal dismissed on limitation grounds alone doesn't bar writ jurisdiction, adjudication order set aside for fresh consideration

Karnataka HC set aside an adjudication order and remitted the matter back to the original authority for fresh consideration. The court held that when an appeal is dismissed solely on limitation grounds without merits adjudication, it does not constitute a valid appeal in law, and no merger occurs with the original order. This preserves the HC's jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The court applied precedent from R.S. Marketing case and rejected respondent's contention that the appellate authority's dismissal barred writ jurisdiction. The writ petition was allowed.

---

---

Issues:
Challenging impugned order of adjudication dated 30.08.2024 and seeking other reliefs; Discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A; Appeal dismissed on grounds of limitation; Applicability of Circular dated 27.12.2022; Jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

Analysis:

The petitioner sought to challenge the impugned order of adjudication dated 30.08.2024 and other reliefs. The respondent issued a show-cause notice on 13.07.2023, followed by the petitioner's reply and a subsequent endorsement dated 22.08.2023. The impugned order was passed on 30.08.2023, leading to the petitioner filing an appeal under Section 107 of the K.G.S.T Act, which was dismissed on grounds of limitation by the Appellate Authority. The petitioner contended that discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A were due to bona fide reasons, citing a Circular dated 27.12.2022. The petitioner argued that the appeal dismissal did not consider the Circular, and hence, the impugned order should be set aside and the matter reconsidered. The petitioner relied on a previous court decision for support.

In contrast, the learned AGA for the respondents argued that the writ petition lacked merit and should be dismissed. The judgment highlighted a similar case, R.S. Marketing and Logistics Private Limited, where a co-ordinate Bench set aside an adjudication order due to discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A, referencing the Circular dated 27.12.2022. The Court found the Circular applicable to the case, setting aside the adjudication order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration, granting the petitioner another opportunity to participate. The judgment emphasized the importance of following the Circular's procedure and giving a fair chance to the petitioner to present their case.

Regarding the dismissal of the appeal on grounds of limitation, the Court clarified that such dismissal does not prevent it from exercising jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The Court held that the dismissal on limitation grounds did not involve an adjudication on merits, allowing it to review the impugned order. The Court stressed that the present order's peculiar circumstances should not be considered a precedent for other cases. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, remitted the matter for fresh consideration, and reserved liberty for the petitioner to submit pleadings and documents.

---