TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petition Dismissed: Supreme Court Denies Special Leave Due to 660-Day Delay and Lack of Merit.</h1> <h3>PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SURAT-2 Versus SHREE MADHI SURALI VIBHAG NAGARIK SAHAKARI DHIRAN MANDALI LTD.</h3> The SC dismissed the special leave petition due to an inordinate delay of 660 days in filing, finding no sufficient cause to condone such delay. ... Penalty imposed u/s. 271D and 271E - default u/s 269SS and Section 269ST - delay fillIng SLP - ITAT and HC [2022 (7) TMI 1551 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] deleted addition as there is no intention/mens rea on the part of the assessee-Co-operative society to accept the cash deposit from its members in their accounts maintained by it similar to savings account maintained by the banks in view of the provision of section 273B. No penalty would be leviable if the person concerned proves that there is reasonable cause for the alleged failure. HELD THAT:- There is an inordinate delay of 660 days in filing the special leave petition. The explanation offered seeking condonation of delay is neither satisfactory nor sufficient in law to be condoned. Hence, the application seeking condonation is dismissed. Further, we do not find any merit in the special leave petition. Hence, the special leave petition is dismissed both on the ground of delay as well as on merits. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition due to a delay of 660 days in filing and lack of merit. An 18-day delay in refiling was condoned.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
