Revenue's rectification applications dismissed regarding section 234E interest and section 246A appealable orders

ITAT Pune dismissed Revenue's three miscellaneous applications seeking rectification under section 254. The case involved levy of interest under section 234E and whether intimation of outstanding demand constitutes an appealable order under section 246A. The Tribunal held that where an assessee denies liability under section 143(1) intimation, appeal can be filed before CIT(A). Following SC precedent in CIT vs. Reliance Telecom Limited, the Tribunal confirmed deletion of section 234E interest and directed Revenue to approach higher forum against the order.

---

---

Issues:
- Rectification of order passed by ITAT Pune
- Applicability of section 234E of the Income-tax Act
- Maintainability of appeal against intimation of outstanding demand
- Jurisdiction of ITAT to rectify orders

Analysis:

The judgment concerns the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune's decision on the rectification of an order allowing the appeal of the assessee based on the applicability of section 234E of the Income-tax Act. The Revenue filed Miscellaneous Applications requesting rectification under section 254(2) of the Act due to alleged mistakes in the Tribunal's order. The dispute revolved around the levy of Late Filing Fees under section 234E for the financial years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15. The assessee challenged the interest levied under section 234E, leading to appeals before the CIT(A) and subsequently before the ITAT Pune.

The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal stating that the intimation of outstanding demand is not appealable under section 246A of the Act. The ITAT Pune, however, allowed the appeal of the assessee based on the non-applicability of section 234E prior to 01.06.2015, citing decisions of various High Courts. The Revenue, through Miscellaneous Applications, sought to rectify the ITAT's order, claiming errors in the decision. The assessee argued against the rectification, stating that the Tribunal's decision was correct and that the Revenue's applications were an attempt to review the order, which is impermissible.

The Tribunal examined the provisions of section 246A of the Act, emphasizing that an assessee can appeal against an order passed by a Joint Commissioner or an intimation under section 143. The ITAT's decision to delete the interest levied under section 234E was based on precedents set by High Courts. Citing a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal reiterated that its powers under section 254(2) are limited to correcting mistakes apparent from the record and not beyond that. The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue should approach a higher forum if dissatisfied with the order, dismissing the Miscellaneous Applications.

In light of the above analysis, the Tribunal dismissed all three Miscellaneous Applications filed by the Revenue, upholding its original decision in favor of the assessee.

---