Reassessment notices issued to deceased assessee under Sections 148A(b) and 148 declared invalid and set aside

Delhi HC set aside reassessment proceedings initiated against a deceased assessee. Despite being informed of the assessee's death, the revenue department issued notices under Sections 148A(b) and 148 in the deceased person's name. The court held that issuing notices to a dead person constitutes a fundamental jurisdictional error and is not merely a procedural defect but a condition precedent for validity. The department failed to bring legal heirs on record even when issuing the final notice. The petitioner's participation in proceedings after informing about the death did not constitute waiver of jurisdictional objection. Reassessment proceedings were declared invalid and set aside in favor of the assessee.

---

---

Issues:
Validity of notice issued against a deceased person for reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. The petitioner, as the legal heir of the deceased assessee, challenged the notice under Section 148A (b), impugned order under Section 148A (d), and notice under Section 148 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The respondent initiated proceedings even after being informed of the death of the assessee.

2. The respondent argued that the proceedings were initiated while the assessee was alive and continued with the legal heirs participating in the proceedings. The respondent claimed that the notices were valid as they were issued initially when the assessee was alive.

3. The High Court referred to previous judgments, including Savita Kapila v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, which emphasized that issuing a notice to the correct person is a condition precedent for validity. Notices against deceased persons are considered invalid unless the legal representative submits without objection.

4. The Court also cited cases like Sangeeta Goyal v. Commissioner of Customs and Meenu Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, where similar issues were addressed, leading to the setting aside of reassessment proceedings against deceased persons.

5. Despite the initial notice being issued during the assessee's lifetime, subsequent actions were based on notices issued after the death of the assessee. The Court found that the notices issued in the name of the deceased person were fundamentally flawed and lacked jurisdictional validity.

6. The Court concluded that the impugned notices under Section 148A (b) and 148 for the AY 2015-16 could not be sustained. The actions taken by the respondent were deemed invalid, and the petition was allowed accordingly.

This detailed analysis highlights the key arguments, legal principles, and judgments considered by the Court in deciding the validity of the notices issued against a deceased person for reassessment under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

---