Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether customs duty was liable to remission in respect of goods destroyed by fire in an SEZ unit and whether the matter required remand for consideration of a remission application under Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted its consistent view that where goods are destroyed in an SEZ unit by natural causes, the unit is entitled to remission of customs duty under Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962. It further found that, in the present case, the appellant had not filed the requisite application before the competent authority seeking remission along with supporting documents. For that limited reason, the matter had to go back to the adjudicating authority so that the remission claim could be examined in accordance with law after giving due opportunity.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to seek remission of duty, and the impugned order was set aside with remand to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after observance of natural justice.