Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reduction and confirmation of redemption fine and penalty in respect of the confiscated imported goods called for interference.
Analysis: The imported old and used worn clothing was found to be a restricted item, and confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 was upheld in view of the admitted failure to comply with the licensing requirement. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on similar imports and noted that the fine and penalty had already been reduced to levels considered sufficient to meet the ends of justice. No infirmity was found in the appellate order reducing the redemption fine and penalty.
Conclusion: The reduced redemption fine and penalty were upheld and no further interference was warranted.