Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment orders under the CGST/SGST regime were liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration, and whether such relief could be made conditional on payment of the admitted tax liability.
Analysis: The petitioner had not accessed the portal after cancellation of registration and the assessment orders were issued later. In these circumstances, the Court found substance in the plea that the petitioner may not have been aware of the orders. At the same time, the petitioner had admitted an output tax liability of about Rs.10 lakhs for the relevant months, which remained unpaid. The Court therefore balanced the need for a fresh hearing with the admitted liability by directing deposit of the admitted amount as a condition for restoration.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were set aside and the matter was remanded to the jurisdictional assessing authority for fresh orders after hearing the petitioner, subject to the petitioner remitting Rs.10 lakhs within two weeks.