Review jurisdiction requires an apparent error or new matter; mere disagreement with a writ order was insufficient.

Review under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is available only on discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason. The text states that a writ order passed in the presence of counsel, without contemporaneous objection, and being otherwise appealable, did not disclose any apparent mistake justifying review. A further plea that the writ matter was not covered by an earlier judgment was also found insufficient to show a reviewable error. The review petition was dismissed for want of any permissible ground.

---

---

Issues: Whether the review petition disclosed any ground under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 warranting recall or review of the writ order, particularly on the basis of error apparent on the face of the record.

Analysis: Review under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is maintainable only when the applicant shows discovery of new and important matter, an error apparent on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason. The impugned writ order had been passed in the presence of counsel, no objection was raised at that stage, and the order being appealable, the Court found no basis to treat the matter as involving any apparent mistake warranting review. The plea that the writ matter was not covered by the earlier judgment did not establish a reviewable error.

Conclusion: No ground for review was made out and the review petition was dismissed.

---