Tax Order Challenge Withdrawn After Typographical Error Acknowledged, Appeal Route Opened Under Section 107 of CGST HC allowed withdrawal of writ petition challenging tax order after respondent acknowledged a typographical error in tax period. Petitioner granted liberty ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tax Order Challenge Withdrawn After Typographical Error Acknowledged, Appeal Route Opened Under Section 107 of CGST
HC allowed withdrawal of writ petition challenging tax order after respondent acknowledged a typographical error in tax period. Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal under Section 107 of CGST within two weeks, with appellate authority directed to decide within six weeks. Alternative remedy of appeal deemed appropriate, rendering writ petition unnecessary.
Issues: - Maintainability of the writ petition due to the availability of alternative remedy of appeal - Discrepancy in tax period mentioned in the show cause notice and the impugned order
Analysis: 1. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order dated 27.12.2023. The respondent raised a preliminary objection on the maintainability of the writ petition, citing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal.
2. The petitioner argued that the tax period mentioned in the show cause notice (July 2017 to March 2018) differed from the tax period referred to in the impugned order (2017-18 and 2018-19). This discrepancy could impact the deposit required for filing an appeal, causing hardship to the petitioner.
3. The respondent, after seeking instructions, acknowledged a typographical error in the impugned order regarding the tax period. They clarified that the appeal should be based on the correct calculation for the period from July 2017-18, alleviating the need for an additional deposit based on the erroneous tax period reference.
4. Consequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST within two weeks. The court granted permission for withdrawal and directed the appellate authority to decide on the appeal within six weeks in accordance with the law.
5. The court disposed of the writ petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue the appeal within the specified timeframe, ensuring the resolution of the matter through the appropriate appellate process.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
