Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned GST order and summary order could be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication because the assessee was unable to file a detailed reply owing to seizure of documents, and whether copies and extracts of the seized records were required to be furnished.
Analysis: The seizure of books of account, registers, computer data and related material from the assessee's connected premises was undisputed. In that factual setting, the assessee's inability to place a detailed reply and supporting material before the assessing authority was accepted as a valid explanation. The resulting adjudication, passed without effective opportunity to respond on the merits, warranted interference. The appropriate course was to restore the proceedings to the stage of reply to the show-cause notice and to direct furnishing of the seized materials so that an effective defence could be filed.
Conclusion: The impugned order and summary order were set aside, the matter was remitted for reconsideration afresh from the stage of reply to the show-cause notice, and the assessee was entitled to copies and extracts of the seized records.