Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for violation of natural justice and whether the matter should be restored for fresh consideration after granting an opportunity to the petitioner.
Analysis: The petitioner complained that repeated requests for adjournment on medical grounds were not considered and that the assessment was completed without affording a meaningful opportunity to explain the alleged mismatch between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B. The respondent did not seriously oppose a fresh opportunity being granted. The Court accepted that the impugned order required interference and permitted the dispute to be re-examined after compliance with a deposit condition and filing of objections along with supporting materials.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was restored for fresh adjudication after the petitioner deposits 25% of the disputed tax and files objections within the stipulated time, failing which the original assessment would revive.