Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ceased to have effect after one year in the absence of any fresh attachment order.
Analysis: The attachment was issued on 27.01.2022. The petitioner relied on Section 83(2), which limits the life of a provisional attachment to one year from the date of the order. The respondent conceded that the original attachment order was passed on 27.01.2022 and that no fresh attachment order had been issued thereafter.
Conclusion: The provisional attachment had ceased to have effect, and the bank account could not continue to remain under embargo on the basis of the expired order.
Final Conclusion: The petition was allowed and the respondent bank was directed to permit operation of the petitioner's bank account.
Ratio Decidendi: A provisional attachment under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 cannot continue beyond the statutory period of one year unless a fresh attachment order is issued.