GST Registration Cancellation Overturned: Procedural Flaws Expose Lack of Transparency in Tax Authority's Decision-Making Process

HC found GST registration cancellation invalid due to procedural irregularities. The cancellation order lacked specific reasons, violated natural justice principles, and was based on undisclosed directives from Anti-Evasion Branch. Court set aside the order, directed restoration of registration, and allowed potential future legal proceedings for statutory violations.

---

---

Issues:
Impugning cancellation of GST registration, violation of principles of natural justice, retrospective cancellation of registration, direction from Anti Evasion Branch, lack of specific reasons in Show Cause Notice.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged the cancellation of their Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration with retrospective effect, citing violation of natural justice principles. The cancellation order was based on Section 29(2)(e) of the CGST Act, alleging fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts. The petitioner's registration was initially cancelled in September 2023 but later revoked. The impugned cancellation order in question was issued without specifying the alleged fraud or misstatement, hindering the petitioner's ability to respond meaningfully.

The respondent claimed to have valid reasons for re-issuing the Show Cause Notice (SCN) based on a directive from the Anti-Evasion Branch. However, the impugned SCN lacked crucial details regarding the grounds for cancellation, making it impossible for the petitioner to address the allegations effectively. The cancellation order was deemed unsustainable due to the lack of specific reasons and the absence of any proposal for retrospective cancellation in the SCN.

The High Court found that the cancellation order was passed without independent assessment by the proper officer and solely based on directions from another authority. The directive from the Anti Evasion Branch was not disclosed in the impugned SCN, further highlighting the procedural irregularities and violation of natural justice. Consequently, the court set aside the cancellation order and directed the restoration of the petitioner's GST registration without delay.

In conclusion, the court allowed the petition, emphasizing the importance of adhering to natural justice principles in administrative actions. While the order restored the GST registration, it clarified that the respondent could pursue statutory violations or dues recovery through appropriate legal proceedings in the future. The judgment underscored the significance of providing specific grounds and ensuring due process in administrative decisions to uphold fairness and transparency.

---