Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order confirming the tax demand, passed without effective participation by the assessee, was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration with an opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The tax proposal arose from a mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A. The assessee contended that only eligible input tax credit had been claimed and sought an opportunity to contest the demand on merits. The order had been preceded by a show cause notice and reminders for personal hearing, but the decisive consideration was that the assessee had not been heard before the demand was confirmed. To balance the opportunity sought by the assessee with the need to secure the revenue, the Court directed remand on payment of 10% of the disputed demand and permitted a reply, followed by a fresh adjudication after reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration, subject to payment of 10% of the disputed tax demand and compliance with the directions for reply and hearing.