TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Rules Rs. 4,88,959 as Business Income, Not Other Sources, Ensuring No Loss to Exchequer.</h1> <h3>Singhal Builders Versus ACIT, Circle, Bharatpur</h3> Singhal Builders Versus ACIT, Circle, Bharatpur - [2024] 115 ITR (Trib) 378 (ITAT [Jai]) Issues:Challenge to assessment order on additions/disallowances, treatment of interest on income tax refund as income from other sources, appeal against the order of Learned CIT(A) regarding the addition of interest on refund.Analysis:1. The appellant, a partnership firm, challenged the order dated 15.02.2024 passed by Learned CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi for the A.Y 2017-18. The assessment order by the Assessing Officer computed the total income of the assessee, including additions/disallowances. Notably, two additions were deleted by the CIT(A), while the third addition related to interest on income tax refund was disputed.2. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had received interest u/s 244A on the refund but reported a lower amount as income, leading to an addition of Rs. 15,66,620. The CIT(A) upheld that the interest income was from other sources but reduced the addition to Rs. 4,88,959, deleting the remaining amount.3. The appellant's appeal was dismissed in part by the CIT(A) concerning the interest income on the refund, categorized as income from other sources rather than business income. The appellant contended that the addition of Rs. 4,88,959 was contrary to the law and should be set aside.4. The department supported the reasons given by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A). The appellant had shown the interest income in the Profit and Loss Account under 'any other income,' which was not disputed by the department.5. The Tribunal noted that while the interest on the tax refund should be reported as income from other sources, the appellant had paid tax on it at the same rate as business income. Therefore, there was no loss to the exchequer, and the addition was not justified.6. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the addition of Rs. 4,88,959 categorized as income from other sources, as it should be treated as part of the business income. The order was pronounced on 15/07/2024.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
