Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 was vitiated for non-application of mind, non-consideration of the detenu's representation, non-supply of relied-upon documents, or absence of a live link between the material and the order of detention.
Analysis: The detention was supported by statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, recoveries of smuggled gold, incriminating currency and other materials, and the detenu's own statements. The representation made by the detenu was considered within a reasonable time, and the typographical error in the consideration note was found to be bona fide and non-prejudicial. The record did not establish non-supply of any relied-upon document or any violation of the governing procedural safeguards. The materials were held to be sufficient to sustain the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction, and a live link between the alleged activities and the detention order was found to exist.
Conclusion: The detention order was not vitiated and the challenge to preventive detention failed.