1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Petition Dismissed: 526-Day Filing Delay Not Excused, Condonation Request Denied, Legal Questions Left Open</h1> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 526-day delay in filing, with an unsatisfactory explanation for condonation. The application for ... Allowable business expenditure/commercial expediency - Disallowance of claim of expenditure on the ground that it was not incurred βwholly and exclusively for the purposes of the businessβ - Delay filling SLP - as decided by HC [2022 (11) TMI 782 - ORISSA HIGH COURT] considering that the expenditure was in the nature of moneys advanced to the subsidiaries, it cannot be said that there is no intimate connection between the Assessee and the two subsidiaries as far as the business activities are concerned. HELD THAT:- There is gross delay of 526 days in filing the Special Leave Petition. We are not satisfied with the explanation offered for condonation of delay. Hence, the application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition is also dismissed, keeping open the question of law, if any. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a gross delay of 526 days in filing, with unsatisfactory explanation for condonation of delay. The application seeking condonation of delay was also dismissed, keeping open any question of law. Any pending applications were disposed of.