TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the agreement and deposit of title deeds constituted a valid mortgage by deposit of title deeds, entitling the appellant to a mortgage decree; (ii) Whether the order declining restoration of the appeal suffered from legal infirmity.
Issue (i): Whether the agreement and deposit of title deeds constituted a valid mortgage by deposit of title deeds, entitling the appellant to a mortgage decree.
Analysis: A mortgage by deposit of title deeds under Section 58(f) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 requires a debt, delivery of title deeds and an intention that the deeds shall stand as security. The agreement in question was treated as recording an already completed transaction and not as the instrument creating or extinguishing rights. Once the respondent admitted execution of the agreement and failed to substantiate the plea of coercion, the surrounding facts and conduct supported the conclusion that the deeds were deposited as security for the debt. A separate registered instrument was not necessary where the memorandum was merely evidentiary.
Conclusion: The mortgage by deposit of title deeds was validly established and the decree in favour of the appellant on this issue was warranted.
Issue (ii): Whether the order declining restoration of the appeal suffered from legal infirmity.
Analysis: The challenge to the refusal to restore the appeal was examined independently and found to lack merit. The objection based on the alleged limited authority of counsel was rejected, and no legal infirmity was found in the order dismissing the restoration request.
Conclusion: The refusal to restore the appeal was upheld and no infirmity was found in that order.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside to the extent necessary to restore the trial court decree, with the contractual rate of interest modified downward, so the appellant obtained substantive relief but not on every issue raised.
Ratio Decidendi: When title deeds are delivered with the intention of securing an existing debt and the written memorandum merely records that completed transaction, the arrangement constitutes a mortgage by deposit of title deeds and does not require registration as an instrument of mortgage.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
