Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (8) TMI 1333 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Clinical study services on foreign client's drugs qualify as export of service under Rule 4, exempt from service tax CESTAT Ahmedabad held that clinical study services performed by appellant on drugs supplied by foreign client constituted export of service under Rule 4 ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Clinical study services on foreign client's drugs qualify as export of service under Rule 4, exempt from service tax

                          CESTAT Ahmedabad held that clinical study services performed by appellant on drugs supplied by foreign client constituted export of service under Rule 4 of Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. Despite services being performed in India with delivery of clinical study reports via email/courier to foreign recipient, the tribunal relied on precedent from SAI Life Sciences case and noted department's prior treatment of identical services as exports. The tribunal found scientific and technical consultancy services qualified as export of service, making them exempt from service tax. Appeal was allowed and impugned order set aside.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the clinical trial services provided by the appellant to a foreign client qualify as "Export of Service" under Rule 4 of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012.
                          2. Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax on the services provided to foreign clients.
                          3. The applicability of penalties and interest under the Finance Act, 1994.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Qualification as "Export of Service":
                          The central issue was whether the clinical trial services conducted in India but delivered to a foreign client via electronic means qualify as "Export of Service" under Rule 4 of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. The department argued that since the services were performed in India on goods supplied by the recipient, they do not qualify as export. The appellant contended that their services, primarily involving the analysis of drug effects, do not fall under the exclusion provided in Rule 4, which pertains to goods like machinery or equipment. The tribunal referenced several judgments, including "Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune-I Vs. Sai Life Sciences Ltd" and "Dow Chemical International (P) Ltd. Vs. Commr. Of CGST, Navi Mumbai," which supported the view that services provided to foreign clients, where the deliverables are sent outside India, qualify as export services. The tribunal concluded that the appellant's services indeed qualify as export, as the primary deliverable, the clinical study report, is consumed by the foreign client outside India.

                          2. Liability to Pay Service Tax:
                          The adjudicating authority had initially confirmed a demand for service tax, asserting that the services were not exported. However, the tribunal, after considering the appellant's arguments and precedents, found that the services provided were indeed exported. The tribunal emphasized that the location of the service recipient and the receipt of payment in convertible foreign exchange are crucial factors in determining the export status. The tribunal referred to the principle that service tax is a destination-based consumption tax, as highlighted in the "All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v. Union of India" case, where services consumed abroad are not liable for service tax in India. Consequently, the tribunal held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on the services rendered to their foreign clients.

                          3. Applicability of Penalties and Interest:
                          The original order had imposed penalties under Sections 76 and 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, and demanded interest under Section 75. Given the tribunal's finding that the services were exported and not liable to service tax, the basis for imposing penalties and interest was effectively nullified. The tribunal set aside the penalties and interest, aligning with the view that the appellant's actions did not warrant such measures, as the services were legitimately exported and not subject to tax.

                          Conclusion:
                          The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax, penalties, and interest. It recognized the services as export, thus exempt from service tax under the relevant rules and legal precedents. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, affirming the appellant's position and providing clarity on the export of services in similar contexts.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found