Tax authorities must accept C Forms and F Forms filed after assessment completion with sufficient cause for delay

The AP HC held that tax authorities cannot refuse C Forms and F Forms solely because assessment was completed. Following established precedent, the court ruled that dealers can file these forms after assessment completion if they demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay. The assessing authority must consider subsequently filed forms and may modify assessment orders accordingly. The court noted arithmetical and clerical discrepancies in the assessment order requiring correction. The writ petition was disposed of directing the respondent to consider petitioner's request to accept the forms, subject to satisfactory explanation of the filing delay.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Refusal to grant concessional rate of tax under the C.S.T. Act due to non-production of 'C' Forms.
2. Alleged arithmetical or clerical mistakes in the assessment order.

Detailed analysis:
Issue 1:
The petitioner, a registered dealer under the A.P. VAT Act and C.S.T. Act, filed monthly returns for the financial year 2016-2017. The assessing authority accepted the concessional rate of 2% against 'C' Forms produced but refused the same for a specific turnover of Rs. 22,51,58,089/- due to non-production of 'C' Forms. The petitioner contended that they were not given adequate opportunity to produce the forms and approached the authority post-assessment, but the request was rejected. The petitioner argued that they should be allowed to produce 'C' Forms even after assessment completion, citing a previous judgment. Additionally, the petitioner claimed the assessing authority made mistakes in calculating turnovers.

Issue 2:
The petitioner highlighted arithmetical or clerical errors in the assessment order, pointing out discrepancies in the total turnover, exempted turnover, and net taxable turnover. Despite the petitioner's submission of these errors and a request for correction, the assessing authority refused to amend the mistakes, insisting that corrections should be made through an appeal process.

The Court referred to Rule 12(7) of the CST (R&T) Rules, which allows for furnishing 'C' Forms within three months from the sale date, with a provision for extension on showing sufficient cause. Previous judgments established that 'C' Forms could be filed post-assessment if valid reasons for delay were provided. The Court directed the assessing authority to consider the petitioner's request to accept 'C' Forms and correct any arithmetical or clerical errors in the assessment order after evaluating the petitioner's objections. The Court ordered no coercive recovery of tax until the matters were resolved and closed the case without costs.

---