TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Discretionary trust income taxed at maximum rate under Section 164(1) but individual deductions allowed for beneficiaries</h1> <h3>Smt. Pashiben Prajapati Family Trust (DISC) Versus The Income-tax Officer, Ward-3 (3) (5), Ahmedabad</h3> Smt. Pashiben Prajapati Family Trust (DISC) Versus The Income-tax Officer, Ward-3 (3) (5), Ahmedabad - TMI Issues Involved:1. Taxation at Maximum Marginal Rate2. Non-grant of TDS Credit3. Levy of Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234CIssue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Taxation at Maximum Marginal Rate:The primary contention of the assessee was that the trust should not be taxed at the maximum marginal rate of 42.17% but at normal rates applicable to individuals, as stipulated under the second proviso to Section 164(1) of the Income-tax Act. The trust was declared by a WILL and is the only trust declared by the deceased, thus qualifying for individual tax rates with basic exemption limits and deductions under Chapter VI-A. The assessee argued that due to a change in the ITR forms and an incorrect PAN character, the return was filed in ITR-5 instead of ITR-2, leading to higher taxation.The tribunal noted that the trust was indeed declared by a WILL and was the only trust so declared. However, the shares of the beneficiaries were indeterminate and unknown, as the WILL did not specify the exact shares. This invoked Section 164(1) read with Section 167B(2)(i), which mandates taxation at the maximum marginal rate when beneficiary shares are indeterminate. Despite the trust being the only one declared by the WILL, the tribunal upheld the revenue's decision to tax at the maximum marginal rate due to the indeterminate shares of the beneficiaries.2. Non-grant of TDS Credit:The assessee claimed that the lower authorities erred in not granting TDS credit as per Form 26AS amounting to Rs. 68,042. The tribunal instructed the AO to consider the grievance regarding the non-credit of TDS and to grant the same after due verification, if warranted.3. Levy of Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C:The assessee contested the levy of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C, totaling Rs. 87,761. Since the substantive ground of taxing at the maximum marginal rate was upheld, the consequential ground regarding the interest was also dismissed.Conclusion:The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify and grant the TDS credit and deductions under Section 80C and 80TTA, if applicable. However, the tribunal upheld the taxation at the maximum marginal rate due to the indeterminate shares of the beneficiaries, in line with Section 164(1) read with Section 167B(2)(i). The levy of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was also upheld.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
