TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Notice to Deceased Quashed; Fresh Notice Allowed for Legal Representative; CBDT Advised on Future Instructions.</h1> <h3>Geeta w/o Amol Tapadia Legal heir of Amol Ramkishan Tapadia Versus The Principal Commissioner, Income Tax-4, Pune, The Income Tax Officer, Central Ward-13 (1), Pune, The Assessing Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi.</h3> Geeta w/o Amol Tapadia Legal heir of Amol Ramkishan Tapadia Versus The Principal Commissioner, Income Tax-4, Pune, The Income Tax Officer, Central Ward-13 ... Issues:Challenge to show cause notice for re-opening assessment due to being issued to a deceased person under Income Tax Act.Analysis:The petitioner, a widow, challenged a show cause notice issued under Section 148-A (b) of the Income Tax Act for re-opening assessment for the year 2020-2021, along with the consequential order and notice issued by Respondent No.2. The petitioner's husband had passed away due to Covid-19, and the notices were issued in his name after his demise. The petitioner contended that the entire proceeding was flawed as the initial notice was served on a deceased person. The High Court focused on the effect of issuing a notice to a dead person, emphasizing the need for proper service to advance the case. The Department acknowledged no specific provision to withdraw such notices but highlighted the authority of the CBDT to issue instructions under Section 119 for effective administration.The petitioner cited judgments from other High Courts, such as the Delhi High Court and Madras High Court, emphasizing that legal representatives are not statutorily obligated to inform the tax department of the assessee's death. The court recognized the duty of the Department to ensure accurate service of notices and the impracticality of serving a notice on a deceased person. It recommended the CBDT to issue instructions for recalling notices issued to deceased individuals to avoid unnecessary legal proceedings.Consequently, the High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned notice issued to the deceased person. It granted liberty to the Department to issue a fresh notice to the appropriate legal representative. The court kept contentions open regarding the replacement notice, considering the lack of prior knowledge about the demise. The court directed the Department to present the order to the CBDT for compliance with the recommendation to issue instructions for recalling notices served to deceased individuals under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act.
TaxTMI 