TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Accused granted statutory bail after 61 days in custody for GST evasion under Section 132(1)(i)</h1> <h3>Usman Pulakkal Versus State of Kerala, The Intelligence Officer, Kerala State GST Ernakulam.</h3> Usman Pulakkal Versus State of Kerala, The Intelligence Officer, Kerala State GST Ernakulam. - 2024:KER:59591 Issues:Application for bail under Sec.439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving alleged tax evasion under Sec. 132 (1) (i) of the Central and State GST Act, 2017.Analysis:The judgment pertains to an application for bail filed by the sole accused in a case registered by the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Department for allegedly committing an offense under Sec. 132 (1) (i) of the GST Act. The accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. The prosecution alleges that the accused obtained fake registration certificates to claim input tax credit, evading tax amounting to Rs.15.91 crore.The petitioner's counsel argued that the accused is innocent, with no substantial evidence against him. The petitioner has been in custody for 61 days, and the investigation is incomplete. The counsel contended that the accused is entitled to bail as the offense is punishable for up to five years. The Special Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing incriminating evidence and the risk of tampering with evidence if released.The court considered the provisions of Sec. 167 of the CrPC, which allow for the release of an accused on bail if the investigation is not completed within a specified period. Referring to legal precedents, the court highlighted that an accused gains an indefeasible right to bail if the investigation exceeds the prescribed period. Given the circumstances of the case, the court concluded that the petitioner is entitled to statutory bail under Sec. 167(2) of the Code.Consequently, the court granted bail to the petitioner upon executing a bond and imposing specific conditions. These conditions include regular appearances before the Investigating Officer, refraining from influencing witnesses or tampering with evidence, surrendering the passport if applicable, and adherence to other stipulations. The court empowered the jurisdictional court to consider any applications for bail cancellation and allowed for modifications to the bail conditions as necessary. Additionally, the Investigating Officer retained the authority to continue the investigation and effect recoveries as per legal guidelines even while the accused is on bail.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
