Assessee wins appeal against reopening assessment under section 147 for unexplained cash deposits after disclosing consolidated income

The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee's appeal regarding reopening of assessment under section 147 for unexplained cash deposits. The assessee had not filed returns for AY 2007-08 to 2011-12 but later disclosed business income by applying 3% net profit rate on bank receipts totaling Rs. 5,49,320 and paid tax of Rs. 45,180. The tribunal held that once income was offered to tax in consolidated manner for AY 2011-12, no further additions could be made in respective assessment years. Penalties under section 271(1)(c) were also deleted following the quantum appeal decision.

---

---

Issues:
Appeals against orders of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-15, Delhi for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. Two issues: challenging validity of reopening of assessment under Section 147 and merits of additions sustained by first appellate authority.

Quantum Appeals (ITA Nos.4395/Del/2016 & 4396/Del/2016):
The legal issue challenged the validity of reopening assessment under Section 147 due to cash deposits in the bank account. Assessing Officer added deposits as unexplained cash credit under Section 68. Notice under Section 148 was issued on 28th March, 2014, but not served. Another notice on 8th July, 2014 was served after six years, rendering proceedings invalid. Merits issue involved cash deposits from business, with the first appellate authority estimating profit at 25% of receipts. Assessee offered income for all years in 2011-12, so no further addition was warranted.

Appeals arising out of penalty proceedings (ITA Nos.5516/Del/2019 & 5517/Del/2019):
Since additions were deleted in quantum appeals, penalties under Section 271(1)(c) were also deleted. All appeals of the assessee were allowed, and penalties imposed were deemed invalid.

The Tribunal held that the notice served after the six-year period was invalid, rendering the assessment orders invalid. On the merits, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's claim that the cash deposits were from business activities. As the assessee offered income for all relevant years in 2011-12, no further additions were justified. Consequently, the additions sustained by the first appellate authority were deleted.

In conclusion, all appeals by the assessee were allowed, and penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) were deleted due to the favorable decision in the quantum appeals. The judgment was pronounced on 9th August, 2024.

---