Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported steel goods, described as end cut rejected CR strips in coil form, could be withheld from provisional release for want of BIS certification and Ministry of Steel clarification under the Steel and Steel Products (Quality Control) Order, 2020 and the later circular.
Analysis: The governing quality control order was issued under Section 16 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016 and applied to the steel items specifically covered in its table. The goods in question were found to be non-prime rejected steel strips, and there was no specific mention of such goods in the original order. The later circular expanding the compliance requirement to all steel consignments was treated as prospective, particularly in light of the foreign trade policy principle that a change in import policy does not affect imports already made before the restriction. The test reports and examination material also did not yield a definitive finding on the exact nature of the goods to justify denial of provisional release.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to provisional release of the goods without insisting on BIS certification.
Final Conclusion: The impugned refusal to grant provisional release was set aside in substance, and the goods were directed to be released on the basis stated by the Tribunal, without prejudice to any further departmental proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: A later import-compliance clarification enlarging the scope of restriction operates prospectively and cannot be used to deny provisional release of consignments already imported, where the original quality control order did not expressly cover the goods in question.