Tax Demand Order Invalidated: Petitioner Denied Fair Hearing, Case Remanded for Proper Procedural Compliance with Opportunity to Respond HC set aside tax demand order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest. Remanded case for reconsideration, directing respondent ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tax Demand Order Invalidated: Petitioner Denied Fair Hearing, Case Remanded for Proper Procedural Compliance with Opportunity to Respond
HC set aside tax demand order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest. Remanded case for reconsideration, directing respondent to provide personal hearing and allow 15-day reply to show cause notice. Bank amount appropriated will be subject to final proceedings outcome. No costs awarded.
Issues: Challenge to tax demand due to lack of reasonable opportunity for contesting, Reversal of Input Tax Credit, Compliance with principles of natural justice, Appropriation of amount from bank account, Setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter for re-consideration.
Challenge to Tax Demand: The petitioner challenges an order dated 26.12.2023, claiming they did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner, a small-scale business dealer not well-versed with the GST portal, engaged a consultant who failed to inform them about the show cause notice and other communications. Despite lodging an appeal immediately upon learning of the order, it was rejected as beyond the condonable period.
Reversal of Input Tax Credit: The confirmed tax proposal relates to the Input Tax Credit availed in GSTR 3B returns for September in the assessment period 2022-23. The petitioner reversed the Input Tax Credit to the extent of Rs. 4,73,810/- in the GSTR 3B return for March in the same assessment year. Due to the inability to participate in proceedings, this reversal was not brought to the respondent's notice, leading to an appropriation of Rs. 6,57,647/- from the petitioner's bank account.
Compliance with Principles of Natural Justice: The Special Government Pleader confirms that after scrutiny of returns, a notice and a personal hearing were provided to the petitioner, demonstrating compliance with principles of natural justice. The petitioner submitted GSTR 3B returns for September and March 2022-23, showing the reversal of Input Tax Credit.
Appropriation of Amount from Bank Account: A sum of Rs. 6,57,647/- was deducted from the petitioner's bank account on 05.04.2024, matching the total demand, including interest and penalty. This action secured the revenue interest fully, justifying a remand in the case.
Setting Aside the Impugned Order and Remanding for Re-Consideration: The High Court sets aside the order dated 26.12.2023 and remands the matter to the respondent for re-consideration. The petitioner is granted fifteen days to reply to the show cause notice, and the respondent is directed to provide a reasonable opportunity, including a personal hearing, before issuing a fresh order within three months. The amount appropriated from the petitioner's bank account shall be subject to the outcome of the remanded proceedings. The case is disposed of with no costs incurred.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.