Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Validity of the sanction accorded for issuance of notice under Section 148 and passing of the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the sanction was issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax for a case relating to Assessment Year 2018-2019.
Analysis: The reassessment action related to Assessment Year 2018-2019 and the impugned notice and order were issued on 22 April 2022, i.e. beyond three years. In such a case, Section 151(ii) required sanction by the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax. The proviso to Section 151, inserted with effect from 1 April 2023, was held inapplicable. Since the sanction had been granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, it was invalid and the reopening action could not stand.
Conclusion: The sanction was invalid and the notice under Section 148 and the order under Section 148A(d) were quashed and set aside in favour of the assessee.