Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Entitlement to interest on delayed refund under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, and whether the claim could be denied because the refund had remained under investigation and legal dispute.
Analysis: Section 38 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 prescribes a mandatory time frame for processing refunds and makes the refund payable after the stipulated period in the case of a quarterly return. Section 42 provides that an assessee entitled to refund is also entitled to simple interest from the date the refund became due till the date of actual payment, and the delay attributable to the assessee alone can be excluded. The return itself constituted the refund claim, and there was no material to show that the petitioner caused the delay. The subsequent proceedings and withholding of refund did not extinguish the statutory entitlement to interest, and the later success of the assessee only removed the obstruction to refund.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to statutory interest on the delayed refund, and the rejection of interest on the ground of investigation and legal issues was unsustainable.