TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether goods imported in completely knocked down condition could be treated as motor vehicles for the purpose of applying General Rule of Interpretation 2(a) under the ITC (HS) classification; (ii) Whether the port restriction in Policy Condition 2(II)(d) of Chapter 87 applied to new vehicles imported in completely knocked down condition.
Issue (i): Whether goods imported in completely knocked down condition could be treated as motor vehicles for the purpose of applying General Rule of Interpretation 2(a) under the ITC (HS) classification.
Analysis: The classification under ITC (HS), like the Customs Tariff, is based on the Harmonised System of Nomenclature, and the General Rules of Interpretation are adopted from that system. Goods imported in CKD form are therefore classifiable as complete goods for tariff and import-control purposes. The importer itself classified the goods on that basis in the Bills of Entry, and a contrary approach would create impractical and inconsistent results in import control.
Conclusion: The CKD imports were correctly treated as motor cycles for ITC (HS) classification purposes, and General Rule of Interpretation 2(a) applied.
Issue (ii): Whether the port restriction in Policy Condition 2(II)(d) of Chapter 87 applied to new vehicles imported in completely knocked down condition.
Analysis: The policy conditions for new vehicles contemplate a complete vehicle: compliance with speedometer, steering, headlamp photometry, import from the country of manufacture, conformity with the Motor Vehicles Act and Rules, and type approval under Rule 126 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. Those requirements cannot be satisfied by an unassembled CKD consignment. Reading the expression "motor vehicles" consistently across the policy conditions, it covers only completely built vehicles and not CKD imports. Consequently, the port restriction is confined to fully built new vehicles and does not extend to CKD imports.
Conclusion: The port restriction did not apply to the appellant's CKD imports, and there was no violation justifying confiscation, redemption fine, or penalty.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the confiscation and penalties were unsustainable, and the appellant obtained consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: For import-control purposes under the ITC (HS), policy conditions referring to "new vehicles" and "motor vehicles" apply only to complete vehicles where the stipulated compliance requirements can be fulfilled, and not to vehicles imported in CKD condition.
TaxTMI 
