Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, a State-constituted Advocates Welfare Fund, was entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and whether the proviso to section 2(15) of that Act applied to its receipts from sale of welfare fund stamps and allied collections.
Analysis: The assessee was created under the State enactment for the welfare of advocates and their families, with income derived from welfare fund stamps, subscriptions, interest and grants. The Central Advocates Welfare Fund Act, 2001 contained a saving provision by which its operation did not extend to States where the enactments specified in Schedule II were already applicable, and the Tamil Nadu enactment was included in that Schedule. The decision also noted that section 23 of the Central Act granted income-tax exemption to the Advocates Welfare Fund of the State. On that basis, the receipts of the fund were treated as falling within the statutory exemption framework and not as business income attracting the restrictive effect of the proviso to section 2(15).
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to exemption and the proviso to section 2(15) was held inapplicable.