Landmark Provident Fund Case: Notice Issued to Respondents, RGST Act Proceedings Temporarily Restrained Under Section 6(2)(b)

HC issued notice to absent respondents regarding PF payment, returnable within three weeks. The Court restrained respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 from proceeding under the RGST Act 2017, finding a subsequent notice barred under Section 6(2)(b). An interim order was passed allowing CGST Authorities to continue their proceedings. The case was directed to be listed with another Civil Writ Petition for consolidation.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Service of advance copy to respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4
2. Bar on subsequent notice by State Authorities under CGST and RGST Act
3. Interim order restraining respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 from further proceedings
4. Clarification on the interim order not affecting proceedings by CGST Authorities
5. Listing the case with another Civil Writ Petition
6. Direction for the Registry to publish the name of the representing counsel

Analysis:

1. The High Court noted that while an advance copy had been served to respondent No.1, no appearance was made on behalf of respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4. Consequently, the Court decided to issue notice to the absent respondents regarding payment of PF and the notice, returnable within three weeks.

2. The Court considered the submissions made by the petitioner's counsel regarding a notice issued by the Central Goods and Services Tax Authorities under the CGST Act 2017 concerning a similar transaction. Based on this, the Court concluded that a subsequent notice by the State Authorities under the RGST Act 2017 for the same matter was barred under Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and RGST Act 2017. Therefore, the Court restrained respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 from proceeding further pursuant to the impugned show cause notice dated 31.01.2024.

3. An interim order was passed by the Court, specifying that the restriction on further proceedings by respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 should not impede respondent No.1 or the CGST Authorities from continuing with the notice issued by the CGST Authorities to the petitioner on 17.03.2022.

4. The Court directed the case to be listed along with another Civil Writ Petition for further proceedings and consolidation.

5. Additionally, the Court instructed the Registry to publish the name of Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG, who typically represents the Department of Finance, Government of Rajasthan, in this matter.

---