Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment and demand order under the GST law was liable to be quashed on the ground of denial of personal hearing and violation of natural justice.
Analysis: The notice under section 73 was admittedly served on the assessee, and an adjournment request was moved on the portal. A further date was fixed and communicated through the department's portal, but no reply was filed and no appearance was made before the proper officer. In these circumstances, the failure of the assessee to respond to the show-cause notice or avail the hearing fixed by the authority meant that the plea of denial of opportunity could not be accepted. The availability of the statutory appellate remedy was also noted.
Conclusion: The challenge to the demand order on the ground of violation of natural justice failed, and the writ petition was dismissed against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The demand order was sustained, and the Court declined to interfere in writ jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a show-cause notice is duly served and the assessee neither files a reply nor avails the hearing fixed by the authority, a later plea of denial of personal hearing or natural justice is not tenable.