TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Interest Dispute Resolved: Petitioner Directed to Pay Interest on 700-Day Delay, Fresh Order to Be Issued</h1> <h3>Amman Constructions, Represented by its Partner Mr. Rajesh Kumar Versus The Assistant Commissioner, Nanganallur Assessment Circle, Chennai</h3> Amman Constructions, Represented by its Partner Mr. Rajesh Kumar Versus The Assistant Commissioner, Nanganallur Assessment Circle, Chennai - 2024 (88) G. ... Issues:Challenge to imposition of interest in an order related to assessment period 2017-2018.Analysis:The petitioner contested the imposition of interest in an order dated 31.12.2023 concerning the assessment period 2017-2018. The petitioner argued that there was a mismatch between their GSTR 3B return and GSTR 1 statement, but the tax liability had been discharged. The petitioner claimed that interest was calculated based on a delay of 2080 days, while they asserted the delay was only 700 days, requesting reconsideration.Analysis:The respondent, represented by Mr. C. Harsha Raj, AGP (T), contended that natural justice principles were followed through intimation, show cause notice, and a personal hearing. It was emphasized that there was no discretion regarding interest liability.Analysis:The impugned order acknowledged the belated payment of taxes by the petitioner, leaving the interest aspect for consideration. The petitioner's argument of a 700-day delay instead of 2080 days was deemed significant. Consequently, the court set aside the order in terms of interest liability, requiring the petitioner to discharge the interest within 15 days based on the 700-day delay. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to respond to the show cause notice on interest liability, with the respondent directed to issue a fresh order within three months upon satisfaction of the interest payment.Analysis:The writ petition was disposed of without costs, with connected miscellaneous petitions closed as per the above terms.
TaxTMI 