Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders could be sustained when they introduced a residuary classification different from the classification proposed in the show-cause notice, and whether the availability of an alternate statutory remedy barred interference under Article 226.
Analysis: The assessment notices proposed classification under one entry, but the final assessment orders proceeded on a different residuary entry, thereby departing from the basis on which the assessee was called upon to respond. A notice must disclose the foundation of the proposed action so that the noticee can meet the exact case set up against it; a final order cannot travel beyond the notice and build a new case without prior intimation. Such a departure renders the proceedings vulnerable for breach of natural justice. The existence of an alternate remedy does not create an absolute bar where the impugned action is vitiated by violation of natural justice, since that is a recognised exception to the rule of alternate remedy.
Conclusion: The assessment orders could not be sustained in their present form because they were passed in breach of natural justice. The writ appeals were therefore allowed to the limited extent of modifying the relief and permitting objections to be filed against the impugned orders treated as show-cause notices.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order that proceeds on a classification or basis not disclosed in the show-cause notice is invalid for breach of natural justice, and the rule of alternate remedy does not bar writ relief in such a case.