TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Orders Recalculation of Interest on Net Receivables Following Assessee's Argument and DRP's Directions.</h1> <h3>Stryker India Private Limited Versus DCIT, Circle 22 (2), Delhi.</h3> Stryker India Private Limited Versus DCIT, Circle 22 (2), Delhi. - TMI Issues:1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment2. Treatment of Outstanding Trade Receivables as Loan3. Application of Interest Rate on Outstanding Receivables4. Benchmarking of Interest Rate5. Delay Period for Charging Interest6. Netting off Payables for Interest Calculation7. Compliance with DRP DirectionsTransfer Pricing Adjustment:The appeal challenges the enhancement of the assessee's income by a specific amount due to Transfer Pricing adjustments under section 92CA(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The grounds of appeal include errors in treating outstanding receivables from Associated Enterprises (AEs) as a separate international transaction and re-characterizing them as a loan advanced to AEs. The appeal also contests the disregard of judicial pronouncements in India during the Transfer Pricing adjustments.Treatment of Outstanding Trade Receivables as Loan:During Transfer Pricing proceedings, the TPO observed that the assessee had significant outstanding trade receivables from its AEs, not mentioned in Form 3CEB or benchmarked in the TP study. As the assessee did not respond to this issue, the TPO treated the delayed payments as unsecured loans to AEs and proposed an interest rate based on the prevailing SBI Base Rate.Application of Interest Rate on Outstanding Receivables:The TPO proposed to charge interest on the outstanding receivables based on the SBI Base Rate, as the assessee did not provide details on payment dates. The entire outstanding amount was treated as a loan advanced to the AEs.Benchmarking of Interest Rate:The DRP directed the TPO to verify if the outstanding receivables were denominated in foreign currency and suggested using the LIBOR rate as an appropriate benchmark interest rate for transactions in foreign currency. The TPO was instructed to apply the LIBOR rate plus the assessee's credit rate, as per a judgment of the Delhi High Court.Delay Period for Charging Interest:The DRP recommended considering a delay of 60 days as reasonable for charging interest on receivables, based on normal trade practices. The AO/TPO were directed to net off payables and charge interest on net receivables accordingly.Netting off Payables for Interest Calculation:The counsel for the assessee argued that the AO/TPO did not comply with the DRP's direction to net off payables and charge interest on net receivables. The Tribunal found merit in this argument and remitted the issue back to the AO/TPO to apply the DRP's directions properly and decide in accordance with the law.Compliance with DRP Directions:The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, noting that the AO/TPO had not properly applied the DRP's directions. The issue was remitted to the AO/TPO to recompute the interest chargeable on outstanding net receivables as directed by the DRP.
TaxTMI 