Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (7) TMI 719 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) deleted as incorrect legal claims don't constitute concealment or inaccurate particulars ITAT Mumbai-AT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The assessee maintained separate books for proprietorship ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) deleted as incorrect legal claims don't constitute concealment or inaccurate particulars

                          ITAT Mumbai-AT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The assessee maintained separate books for proprietorship concerns, made investments from own capital, and provided all dividend income details. The tribunal held that failure to make disallowance under Section 14A or compute administrative expenses for exempt income does not constitute concealment or inaccurate particulars. Following SC precedent in CIT v. Reliance Petro Products, making incorrect legal claims cannot amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. The penalty was deleted as revenue failed to prove concealment or inaccurate income particulars.




                          Issues:
                          1. Appeal against order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
                          2. Challenge of penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
                          3. Proper opportunity of being heard during appellate proceedings
                          4. Justification for penalty imposition based on inaccurate particulars of income
                          5. Disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D and its impact on penalty imposition

                          Issue 1: Appeal against order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

                          The appellant/assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the A.Y. 2009-10. The grounds of appeal included challenges regarding the proper opportunity of being heard during the appellate order and the confirmation of penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant contended that the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was framed in breach of statutory provisions.

                          Issue 2: Challenge of penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

                          The penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) was challenged by the appellant on various grounds. The appellant argued that the penalty was levied based on inaccurate particulars of income and that the conditions for initiating penalty proceedings were not fulfilled. The appellant also contended that the penalty could not be justified as the disallowance made under section 14A r.w.r. 8D was on an estimation basis only.

                          Issue 3: Proper opportunity of being heard during appellate proceedings

                          The appellant raised concerns regarding the lack of proper, effective, and fair opportunity of being heard during the appellate proceedings. It was argued that the appellant was not granted sufficient opportunity to present their case before the appellate authority, leading to a violation of the principles of natural justice.

                          Issue 4: Justification for penalty imposition based on inaccurate particulars of income

                          The penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were initiated for concealment of income/furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The appellant clarified that the penalty was not warranted as the additions were made on an estimated basis. The appellant maintained separate accounts for shares accounting and had provided necessary documents during the proceedings.

                          Issue 5: Disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D and its impact on penalty imposition

                          The disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D was a key factor in the penalty imposition. The appellant's submissions regarding the disallowance and the nature of expenses incurred in relation to earning exempt income were considered during the penalty proceedings. The authorities concluded that the appellant had furnished inaccurate particulars of income, leading to the penalty imposition.

                          In the final judgment, the Tribunal analyzed the case in light of relevant legal precedents and observed that the appellant had not concealed income or furnished incorrect particulars of income. The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable and deleted the penalty. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of strict adherence to the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the principles of natural justice.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found