Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether toilet soaps cleared to the Canteen Stores Department were liable to valuation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the basis of maximum retail price, or under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on transaction value.
Analysis: Section 4A applies only where the goods are specified by notification and there is a requirement under the Standards of Weights & Measures law or any other law to declare retail sale price on the package. The governing test therefore depends not merely on notification of the goods, but also on the statutory obligation to affix MRP. Rule 2A of the Standards of Weights & Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 excludes packages meant for industrial consumers or institutional consumers. Canteen Stores Department was treated as an institutional consumer, and the clearance to it was not regarded as retail sale to the general public. On that basis, the statutory conditions for Section 4A were not satisfied.
Conclusion: Valuation was required to be made under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and not under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944; the demand raised on the differential basis was unsustainable.