TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Manufacturer Wins Partial Tax Relief: 12-Month Payment Plan Approved with Initial Rs. 25 Lakh Installment</h1> <h3>M/s. Ohm Srinivasa Paper Boards Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Authorized Representative Mr. A. Ramasubramanian Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Virudhunagar</h3> M/s. Ohm Srinivasa Paper Boards Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Authorized Representative Mr. A. Ramasubramanian Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Central GST ... Issues:Challenge to summary order creating demand under existing laws, self-assessment under Central Excise Act, failure to pay admitted liability under Sabka Vishwas Scheme, due amount of tax, interest, and penalty, partial payment made by petitioner, discretion to pay balance amount in installments, consequences of failure to pay.Analysis:1. The petitioner challenged the summary order creating a demand under existing laws for arrears of tax on self-assessment under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The demand was based on self-assessment made by the petitioner under the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The petitioner had previously approached the designated authority under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme but failed to pay the admitted liability, resulting in a due amount of Rs. 1,46,79,069 towards tax, interest, and penalty.2. The petitioner, a Manufacturing Company with accumulated losses, made partial payments totaling Rs. 25,00,000 against the demanded amount. This left a balance of Rs. 1,21,79,069 due and payable. The respondent invoked powers under Section 142(8) of the CGST Act, 2017, and Rule 142(A)(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, to demand the outstanding amount.3. The court, noting the absence of other disputes, decided to exercise discretion in favor of the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to pay the balance amount in 12 equated monthly installments starting from 01.08.2024 to 01.07.2025. This decision was made considering the petitioner's status as a Manufacturing Company facing difficulties in discharging tax liabilities.4. In case of failure to comply with the payment schedule, the respondent was granted the liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with the law. This could include attaching the petitioner's properties for sale and utilizing other legal measures to recover the outstanding amount.5. The Writ Petition was disposed of with the above observations, and no costs were awarded. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions were also closed as a consequence of the judgment.
TaxTMI 